剛不久，黃仁勳做客著名的喬.羅根訪談，談到AI的影響時，黃仁勳稱：或許兩三年內，全球 90%的知識都將由人工智慧生成。
以下對話為黃仁勳對這個結論的解釋：
『 黃仁勳：再過個兩三年 —— 說不定就兩三年時間 —— 全球 90% 的知識都可能是 AI 生成的。
In the future, in a couple of years—maybe two or three years—90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI.
喬.羅根：這也太離譜了吧。
That’s crazy.
黃仁勳：我知道聽著誇張，但其實也沒啥大不了的。
I know, but it’s just fine.
喬.羅根:可這真的沒問題嗎？
But it’s just fine？
黃仁勳：真的沒事，我很清楚。我跟你說說為何會這麼說。
I know.And the reason for that is this, let me tell you why.
喬.羅根：你講。
Okay.
黃仁勳：原因很簡單：從一本由一群素不相識的人編撰的教科書裡學知識，和從 AI 整合全網資訊、重新合成的內容裡學知識，對我來說有啥本質區別嗎？
It’s because, um, what difference does it make to me that I’m learning from a textbook that was generated by a bunch of people I didn’t know? Or written by a book that, you know, from somebody I don’t know? Uh, to, uh, knowledge generated by AI computers that are assimilating all of this and re-synthesizing things.
在我看來，這兩者其實沒多大不同。不管來源是啥，我們都得去核驗事實，都得確保內容符合底層的第一性原理，這些事和我們現在做的，其實完全一樣。
To me, I don’t think there’s a whole lot of difference.We still have to, we still have to fact-check it.We still have to make sure that it’s, you know, based on fundamental first principles and we’ll still have to do all of that just like we do today.』
我個人的經驗直覺告訴我，“老黃”說的大概沒錯！
你認為呢？ （跟著大咖學AI）