文/林奇芬高股息ETF是投資人的最愛，目前在台股ETF中，有近八成投資人持有高股息ETF。而今年以來高股息ETF配息越來越少，同時總報酬率也大幅落後，若想要高配息，但又不想「賺到利息、賠掉價差」，你還有甚麼選擇呢?有三類標的，你可以掌握。做好配置，股市多空都不怕。最近二代健保補充費修法的新聞鬧得沸沸揚揚，結果行政院很快就回應，「暫緩規劃」。因為靠股息、利息的小資族、退休族實在太多了，牽一髮動全身。不過，從民眾激烈反應中也可以知道，配息收入已經成為許多人重要的資金來源。高股息ETF股價疲弱，配息縮水2024年曾經引發高股息ETF搶購潮，投資人一窩蜂的買進高股息ETF，讓高股息ETF規模暴衝。然而，近一年來，高股息ETF配息率越來越低，總報酬率也越來越少，許多投資人開始問，「是不是要轉檯了?」其實，高股息ETF產品沒有問題，只是不同的時空環境，有不同的商品表現機會。以近二年為例，推動台股成長的動能是AI相關產品，因此AI股票漲翻天，而過去投資人心儀的高股息股票，如金融、航運、電信、部分傳產股等，今年股價則大幅落後，因此高股息ETF只能交出普普通通的成績單。市值型、產業型ETF，股價配息雙賺然而，投資人若想要獲得高配息，不一定要在高股息股票中尋找，若一家公司業務大幅成長，自然有能力配出好的股息。同樣的，一檔市值型或科技型ETF，股價大幅成長後，也有能力配出高息與投資人分享。目前台股ETF大多數有配息設計，有些是年配、半年配(例如0050、006208)，也有採取季配(如00690、00894)，而且有多檔配息率並不輸給高股息ETF。再加上今年以來股價表現亮眼，可說是股價、股息雙賺。因此，投資人並不需要拘泥於只買高股息來領息。在市值型與產業型ETF中，有許多可留意標的，以下整理近一年來配息率較高的台股ETF，提供投資人參考。國外股票ETF，少數有配息設計除了台股ETF外，投資境外股票的ETF，較多數採取不配息策略，但有少數幾檔仍然有配息設計。此外，因為考量投資人喜歡配息，近一、二年也有國外高股息股票ETF陸續推出，不過多數期間未滿一年，尚無完整資料。以下整理幾檔配息率較高的國外股票ETF。債券ETF穩健領息，降息有利債券價格另外，近幾年開始受到投資人注意的債券ETF，則普遍都有配息設計。多數採取季配息，但月配息產品也越來越多。由於美國今年上半年暫緩降息，讓債券市場多空不明，另外，今年4、5月新台幣大幅升值，也帶來一些匯損。不過，目前仍處於降息循環中，因此，投資債券ETF除了領息，還有債券價格上漲利多。此外，從長期分散投資風險來看，現階段市場擔心股票估值過高，搭配適度比重債券，也有利於降低整體資產風險。由於債券ETF種類多元，若想要領較高利息，可以非投資等級債券(多數以BB、B級債券為主)，以及投資等級債券(以BBB級債券為主)、金融債券為主，既有息收、債券違約風險又較低。另外，新興市場債券平均利率水準較高，也有較高配息率。相對之下，美國長天期公債價格波動大、配息率又較低，不見得是最佳領息產品。值得留意的是，境外股票ETF與債券ETF，都屬於境外所得，相關稅負在國外已經先行預扣，並反映在淨值內。在台灣即使有發放股息、債息，都不需要納入綜合所得稅課稅，也不需要繳二代健保。除非是高所得族，一年境外所得超過750萬元以上，超過部分才需要繳納20%稅率。目前股市創下歷史新高，許多投資人擔心股市泡沫化風險，然而，從基本面觀察，企業獲利仍有成長空間，因此可先以股市漲多修正看待。若投資人擔心投資風險高，可以採取高股息ETF、市值型ETF、債券ETF分散持有的方式，來降低波動風險。另外，採取定期定額方式投資，更可以降低追高殺低的風險。(以上為個人看法，不作為投資建議，投資人請自行判斷投資風險)歡迎加入林奇芬治富俱樂部http://www.facebook.com/mrsmoney888林奇芬影音課程「不會投資照樣賺」書籍:「第一份收入就投資，30歲存百萬，40歲領雙薪」「窮人追漲跌，富人看趨勢---投資前你一定要懂的10個指標」「藏富-我用基金賺到一輩子的財富」「治富-社長的理財私筆記」

為投資者解析穩定收益與高成長潛力之間的取捨Joe 盧, CFA | 2025年9月7日 美東時間摘要支付股息的公司通常是成長機會有限的成熟企業，與將所有利潤再投資以尋求擴張的年輕公司形成對比。股息股的主要吸引力在於其提供穩定收益的潛力。投資者不應期望其資本增值水平能與標普500(S&P 500)等大盤指數相同，這可能意味著較低的整體總回報。歷史上，就總回報而言，大盤市值加權指數的表現優於高股息指數，特別是在經濟成長時期。專注於股息的策略也帶來其他風險，包括公司在財務困難時期可能減少或取消股息，以及過度集中於特定、成長較慢的市場產業。微軟(Microsoft)是一家公司從高成長的巨擘，轉型為成熟、現金充裕的產業領導者，並在此過程中開始支付並增加股息的絕佳範例。企業生命周期與股息發放對投資者而言，定期股息支付的吸引力可能很強，它承諾了穩定的收入來源。然而，理解這些支付背後的企業決策以及其內在風險至關重要。提供股息的公司通常是成長機會有限的成熟企業，這與能驅動股價指數回報的高成長公司形成鮮明對比。一家公司的股息政策，往往與其在企業生命周期中所處的階段內在相關。在成長的早期階段，公司通常會將所有利潤再投資回業務中，以推動擴張、研發和搶佔市場。這些公司擁有眾多的投資機會，預期能為股東創造比現金股息更高的回報。隨著公司邁向成熟，它通常已建立了穩固的市場地位，產生了穩定的現金流，並發現其高成長的投資機會日益減少。在此階段，保留所有盈餘可能已非最有效率的資本運用方式。公司可能會選擇將一部分利潤以股息的形式分配給股東，而非讓現金在資產負債表上累積。此舉預示著財務的穩定性以及對股東回報的承諾。案例研究：微軟的股息演進微軟(Microsoft)是歷經此轉變並引人注目的真實範例。在其早期大部分的時間裡，微軟是一家高成長的科技公司，將所有盈餘再投資，以資助創新和擴張。它主導了當時新興的個人電腦軟體市場，並在未支付股息的情況下經歷了爆炸性的成長。然而，隨著公司日趨成熟，其在個人電腦市場的成長開始穩定，它也開始產生巨大且穩定的現金流。2003年，微軟首次發放股息，預示著其資本配置策略的轉變。自那時起，該公司持續增加其股息支付。此一演進反映了微軟從純粹的成長型公司，轉型為更成熟的科技巨頭。幸運的是，仍有許多新的成長領域，如雲端運算(Azure)，為微軟股東帶來了可觀的資本回報。Source: Microsoft.com為何較低的成長通常意味著較高的股息支付股息的決定，通常反映了一家公司的成長前景。公用事業、必需消費品和電信等成熟產業中的公司，是常見的股息支付者。它們的特點是穩定、可預測的盈餘，但成長較慢。儘管這些股息能提供可靠的收入來源，投資者不應期望能獲得與將利潤再投資於未來擴張的成長型公司相同水平的資本增值。大量投資於股息股，可能導致投資組合的分散性較低，並集中於特定產業，使其曝險於該產業特有的風險。此外，公司若面臨財務困境，總是有可能削減或暫停其股息，這可能導致股價大幅下跌。異常高的股息殖利率甚至可能是一個警訊，表明該公司的股價已因潛在的財務問題而下跌。Source: State Street, Dow Jones總回報：股息指數 vs. 市值指數當比較一個專注於股息的指數與如標普500(S&P 500)等大盤市值加權指數的表現時，收入與成長之間的權衡變得顯而易見。歷史上，標普500指數的表現優於許多專注於股息的策略，特別是在由科技和成長股驅動的牛市期間。儘管「股息貴族」(Dividend Aristocrats)（即連續至少25年增加股息的公司）以其穩定性著稱，但它們的回報可能落後於大盤。例如，雖然像寶僑(Procter & Gamble)這樣的公司擁有卓越的股息增長歷史，但其成長軌跡與那些對標普500指數表現有重大影響的高成長公司顯著不同。此一表現差異突顯了投資者的一個關鍵啟示：一個專注於股息的策略，涉及持有處於不同生命周期階段的不同類型公司。儘管高股息概念股能提供一定程度的穩定性和定期收入，但它們通常無法提供與大盤市場相同的高資本成長潛力。尋求類似標普500指數回報的投資者應意識到，一個嚴重偏重高股息概念股的投資組合不太可能實現該目標，因為它從根本上投資於一個具有不同成長前景的市場不同區塊。Source: Morningstar👍若您覺得這份研究有價值，請對本文按讚。📲加入並追蹤鉅亨號，與我們互動，即可獲取更多趨勢指標和市場資訊。📰追蹤此部落格。💬LINE好友。➡️將此分析分享給您的親朋好友，一同獲取最新投資觀點。本電子報僅供參考，不構成任何證券或資產類別的投資建議或買賣推薦。文中所表達的觀點為作者截至發布日期的觀點，如有變動，恕不另行通知。所呈現的資訊乃基於從相信可靠的來源所獲取的數據，但其準確性、完整性和及時性不作保證。過往表現並非未來結果的指標。投資涉及風險，包括可能損失本金。讀者在做出任何投資決策前，應諮詢其財務顧問。作者及相關實體可能持有本文所討論的資產或資產類別的部位。Dividend Stocks: A Trade-Off Between Steady Income and High GrowthUnderstanding the trade-off between steady income and high-growth potential for investors.By Joe 盧, CFA | 09/05/2025Executive SummaryDividend-paying companies are often mature businesses with limited growth opportunities, unlike young companies that reinvest all profits for expansion.The primary appeal of dividend stocks is a potential for steady income. Investors should not expect the same level of capital appreciation seen in broader market indices like the S&P 500, which could mean lower overall total return.Historically, broad market-cap-weighted indices have outperformed high-dividend indices in terms of total return, especially during periods of economic growth.A dividend-focused strategy also carries other risks, including the possibility of a company reducing or eliminating its dividend during financial hardship, and over-concentration in specific, slower-growing market sectors.Microsoft serves as a prime example of a company that initiated and grew its dividend as it transitioned from a high-growth powerhouse to a mature, cash-rich industry leader.The Corporate Lifecycle and Dividend PayoutsFor investors, the allure of a regular dividend payment can be strong, promising a steady stream of income. However, understanding the corporate decisions behind these payouts and the inherent risks is crucial. Companies that offer dividends are often mature businesses with limited growth opportunities, a stark contrast to the high-growth companies that can drive returns in equity indices.A company's dividend policy is often intrinsically linked to its stage in the corporate lifecycle. In the early stages of growth, companies typically reinvest all their profits back into the business to fuel expansion, research and development, and capture market share. These firms have numerous investment opportunities that are expected to generate higher returns for shareholders than a cash dividend would.As a company matures, it often establishes a strong market position, generates consistent cash flow, and finds its high-growth investment opportunities dwindling. At this stage, retaining all earnings may not be the most efficient use of capital. Instead of letting cash accumulate on the balance sheet, the company may choose to distribute a portion of its profits to shareholders in the form of dividends. This signals financial stability and a commitment to shareholder returns.Case Study: Microsoft's Dividend EvolutionA compelling real-world example of this transition is Microsoft. For much of its early life, Microsoft was a high-growth technology company that reinvested all its earnings to fund innovation and expansion. It dominated the then nascent personal computer software market and experienced explosive growth without paying a dividend.However, as the company matured and its growth in the personal computer market began to stabilize, it started to generate enormous and consistent cash flows. In 2003, Microsoft initiated its first dividend, signaling a shift in its capital allocation strategy. Since then, the company has consistently increased its dividend payout. This evolution reflects Microsoft's transition from a pure growth company to a more mature tech giant. Fortunately there are still many new growth areas like cloud computing (Azure) that has returned significant capital to Microsoft shareholders.Source: Microsoft.comWhy Lower Growth Often Means Higher DividendsThe decision to pay dividends is often a reflection of a company's growth prospects. Mature companies in established industries like utilities, consumer staples, and telecommunications are common dividend payers. They are characterized by stable, predictable earnings but slower growth. While these dividends can provide a reliable income stream, investors should not expect the same level of capital appreciation as they might from a growth-oriented company that is reinvesting its profits for future expansion.Investing heavily in dividend stocks can lead to a portfolio that is less diversified and concentrated in specific sectors, exposing it to industry-specific risks. Furthermore, there is always the risk that a company may cut or suspend its dividend if it faces financial trouble, which can lead to a significant drop in the stock price. An unusually high dividend yield might even be a red flag, indicating that the company's stock price has fallen due to underlying financial issues.Source: State Street, Dow JonesTotal Returns: Dividend Index vs. Market Capitalization IndexWhen comparing the performance of a dividend-focused index to a broad market capitalization-weighted index like the S&P 500, the trade-off between income and growth becomes evident. The S&P 500 has historically outperformed many dividend-focused strategies, especially during bull markets driven by technology and growth stocks. While "Dividend Aristocrats" (companies that have increased their dividends for at least 25 consecutive years) are known for their stability, they may lag the broader market's returns. For example, while a company like Procter & Gamble has a remarkable history of dividend increases, its growth trajectory differs significantly from the high-growth companies that heavily influence the S&P 500's performance.Source: MorningstarThis performance disparity highlights a key takeaway for investors: a dividend-focused strategy involves holding a different type of company at a different stage in its lifecycle. While dividend stocks can offer a degree of stability and regular income, they generally do not offer the same potential for high capital growth as the broader market. Investors seeking S&P 500-like returns should be aware that a portfolio heavily weighted towards dividend stocks is unlikely to achieve that goal, as it is fundamentally invested in a different segment of the market with different growth prospects.👍'Like' this article if you found this research valuable.📲 Join our private channels to get more trend indicators and market information delivered directly to you. Choose your preferred channel to stay informed.📰Follow this blog.💬Connect with us on LINE.➡️Share this analysis to someone in your network who appreciates a data-driven perspective.This newsletter is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or asset class. The views expressed are those of the author as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Information presented is based on data obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy, completeness, and timeliness are not guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing involves risks, including the possible loss of principal. Readers should consult with their own financial advisors before making any investment decisions. The author and associated entities may hold positions in the assets or asset classes discussed herein.立即加入《Joe’s 華爾街脈動》LINE@官方帳號，獲得最新專欄資訊（點此加入）關於《Joe’s 華爾街脈動》鉅亨網特別邀請到擁有逾 22 年美國投資圈資歷、CFA 認證的機構操盤人 Joseph Lu 擔任專欄主筆。Joe 為台裔美國人，曾管理超過百億美元規模的基金資產，並為總資產高達數千億美元的多家頂級金融機構提供資產配置優化建議。Joe 目前帶領著由美國頂尖大學教授與博士組成的精英團隊，透過獨家開發的 "趨勢脈動 TrendFolios® 指標"，為台灣投資人深度解析全球市場脈動，提供美股市場第一手專業觀點，協助投資人掌握先機。